16.9 C
Nicosia
Friday, March 29, 2024

From crisis to crisis in the occupied territories, the Turkish Cypriots

Must read

& Alpha; & pi; ό & kappa; & rho; ί & sigma; & eta; & sigma; & epsilon & r; ί & sigma; & eta; & sigma; & tau; & alpha; & kappa; & alpha; & tau; & epsilon; & chi; ό & mu; & epsilon; & nu; & alpha; & omicron; & iota; & Tau; & omicron; & upsilon; & rho; & kappa; & omicron; & kapp & iota; & omicron; & iota;

& nbsp & nbspΑνδρέας Πιμπίσιης & nbsp; & nbsp;

At every opportunity and from every step, Ersin Tatar constantly reiterates the commitment of the “sovereign equality and equal international regime” that he asks to have with the Greek Cypriots in order to accept to return to the negotiating table. He insisted to his foreign interlocutors that there was a “separate state” in the occupied territories. Of course, in reality, what Ersin Tatar portrays as a “state” does not exist not only because the international community has never recognized its existence, but also because of the role that Turkey plays in proving the non-existence of a state. & Nbsp;

The interventions and control exercised by Turkey in the occupied territories lead from one crisis to another. This fact confirms those who claim that what the Ersin Tatar presents as a “state” does not exist in the occupied territories. Just three months after the last “elections” in the occupied territories to elect a new “government”, it finally resigned en masse as – according to the accusations against him – Ersin Tatar failed to resign a “minister”. It was preceded, even before the “government” of Suzuoglu took over, the replacement of the “minister” with another person liked in Ankara. & Nbsp;

The current crisis stems again from the role that Turkey is playing in the Occupied Territories, despite the efforts made by leaders in the Occupied Territories to present a different picture from the real picture. The crisis and controversy stem from the difficult situation in which Turkey has condemned the Turkish Cypriots, despite the efforts of the Turkish Cypriot leadership to conceal the reality. & Nbsp;

READ ALSO:

Debate on widespread acceptance of pseudo-government in the Occupied Territories begins Cyprus: No ballot will be cast until the Turkish elections Occupied: At the table “government of national conciliation”

Although Faiz Suzuoglu has already lived up to Ankara's interventionist role, with the latest example being the appointment of Thaksin Ertugruloglu as “foreign minister”, while he was not in the original “government”, he nevertheless resented the recent blame on Turkey. crisis in the occupied territories. According to Güneş (sources in the GTP) on the way to the meeting with Tatar, Suzuoλουlu used the word “shame” referring to some who constantly claim that Ankara is interfering in the internal affairs of the “TRNC”. “No one should interfere in these cases, it is a shame, no such thing is happening,” he said. He said that these are internal affairs of the “TRNC” and that Turkey is never involved, but some are trying to involve Ankara by force.

Speaking after a meeting of the party's central executive committee in occupied Nicosia, Suzuoglu said they had made an assessment after accepting the resignation of the UBP's “government” with the Democratic Party (DP) and the settlers' Renaissance Party (YDP). . Suzuglou said that some parties consider it right to form a broad-based “government” due to the economic problems they are going through and noted that “these are worth discussing of course, but (…) the government must be formed very quickly, without delays”. & Nbsp;

“The country can not stand the loss of time,” he said, adding that he also met with his partners in the “government”, presidents of the DP and YDP, Fikri Ataoglu and Erhan Arikli. He said that they will meet with the other parties and if there is a determination for everyone to take responsibilities together, then it will be evaluated. Asked if the “minister” of finance, Ata Atun, would be referred to the party's disciplinary council, Suzuoglu said that there was a “government” crisis now and that these issues would concern them in the coming days. & nbsp;

Noting that increases in electricity and alcohol prices are bothering the “government” partners, at least as much as they are bothering his party, Suzuoglu said they made their decisions together and went to Tatar. When asked if there had been any progress to date on electricity and alcohol prices and asked if there would be a change in the coming days, Suzuoglu replied: “If yesterday the president of the republic could have taken a step on the issue of the first “We gave him another file and he could solve the problems.”

However, entering his party session after meeting with him Turkish Cypriot leader Suzuoglu says he is not bitter with Tatar, as “there is no bitterness in politics, there are disagreements”.

Meanwhile, the so-called “finance minister” Sunat Atoun (source Cyprus/GTP) stated that there is no question of opposing the decisions of the party and the “government” and to disobey “. In a written statement issued in connection with the developments in which his name is involved, Atun said that in his well-known speech in the “parliament” he exercised his right to answer and told the truth. He pointed out that he was finally confirmed by two officials of the so-called electricity authority (“KIV-TEK”) and that there is no question of insulting the so-called prime minister. & Nbsp;

“On the contrary, in my well-known speech, I stressed that the Prime Minister has a full right over the ministers and that it is normal for him to sign the text which I did not sign,” he said, adding: “I repeat: The important thing for me is to say the right thing. , to do the right thing. If there is a political price, I will pay it for our people, for our party. Our people and the members of our party will soon understand better what I did and why and they will say that I was right. I'm sure of that. “Republican Turkish Party (CTP) leader Tufan Erciurman said Ersin Tatar, Faiz Suzuoglu and Sunat Atun made mistakes in the process that led to the resignation of the “UBP-DP-YDP” government. In a post on social media, Erhiurman stated the following:

“Mr Atun was wrong. After the prime minister made it so clear that he did not want to work with him, it was up to him to resign. Mr Tatar was wrong. When the letter was sent to him in connection with the termination of Mr. Atun, he had no authority or luxury to reject it, to force it to wait. Mr. Suzuoglu was wrong. If he can not dismiss a minister, he does not submit “conditional resignation” and the like. Whether he is waiting for the minister's oust or if he cannot wait for it, he would submit the resignation of the government directly. Three mistakes made this people experience a masquerade in the midst of such a great crisis. “Whatever decision you make from now on, you can not convince anyone that you are acting seriously and responsibly.” The leader of the People's Party, Kudret Ozersay (source Yeni Duzen/GTP), expressed regret over the situation in which the “country” was led and argued that instability within the National Unity Party is the main source of instability in “Country” in the midst of the severe economic crisis experienced by the “citizens”. & nbsp;

In a written statement, Ozersay expressed the view that the only way to solve the existing problems and to take decisive and courageous steps is to set up a “government” of social consensus in which all parties within the “parliament” will participate. He also called for some “populist” policies to be implemented without populism. & Nbsp; government ”and Tatar led to a loss of prestige of the“ institutions of the state ”. He added: “If there is a state here, the minister appointed by the prime minister can not leave the statements of the prime minister hanging. He can not make statements contrary to those of the Prime Minister and reduce him. The change of minister was a necessary condition, but it seems that it is not possible to show a serious will at this point. . We have been led to the point of saying that we will be better governed if there is no government. (…) ». & Nbsp;

Source: www.philenews.com

- Advertisement -AliExpress WW

More articles

- Advertisement -AliExpress WW

Latest article