The interim decision of the court may reject the lawsuit of Michalis Terepei against EDEK, which concerned the suspension of his status as Secretary of the Central Committee and member of the Credentials Committee and allow the register to be kept in the possession of the president of the Social Democrat Movement, however, the substance of the case now seems to be being considered and the legal dispute over it is now beginning.
In his interim application, Mr. Terepeis asked the court for interim temporary protection, which was rejected. However, Mr. Terepeis himself, as he stated to politis. com. cy feels “that it justifies at first sight the substance of my case. I note in particular that the judgment of the Court states that “there are prima facie indications that there is a visible possibility of success in his action against the Defendants on the basis of the alleged replacement decisions by the Pancyprian Congress of Defendants which concerned the Plaintiff without ».
The leadership of EDEK may “celebrate” for yesterday's decision, he notes, but in essence, Mr. Terepeis calls on the leadership “to reflect on the findings of the Court regarding the substance of the case.” For his part, he underlines his desire for the lawsuit to be heard as soon as possible and expresses the hope, “soon the court will be able to deliver real justice”.
Mr. Terepeis insists that “Mr. “Sizopoulos and his associates, methodized the holding of a replacement congress and elections, violating the decree that was in force and annulling the decision of the court before it is issued”.
We remind you that the court, with its decision yesterday, annulled the decree issued on 01/11/2021, because it considers that since Mr. Terepeis would not reclaim election as a member of the Central Committee and consequently as Secretary of the Central Committee, and since his term would be completed in a short time, the non-issuance of the decrees will not cause him any harm.
The court, however, ruled that the issues raised should be decided at trial of the substance of the action.
“The question to be considered at this stage is whether the Plaintiff demonstrates, on the basis of what he has presented to the Court, at first sight and to the required degree, that his complaints are valid. In the light of the above, I consider that there is prima facie indications of the existence of a visible possibility of success of his action against the Defendants on the basis of the alleged replacement decisions by the Pancyprian Congress of Defendants which concerned the Plaintiff. , notes the decision.
The whole decision:
Action 2403.21 Interim Decision 2.5.2022 (1)
