23 C
Wednesday, April 24, 2024

Tension in Parliament in the debate on education in schools

Must read

Ενταση στη Βο&upsilon ;λor στη συζorτηση για τη διαπαιδα γoγηση στα σχολεiα

The debate on the proposal for a law on sex education in schools began on Friday morning in the Plenary Session of the Parliament.

The proposal on sex education in schools was characterized as blatantly unconstitutional by the President of DIKO. "The Parliament has no right to decide what the curriculum is. This initiative will hinder teaching in the end,' said Mr. Papadopoulos, among other things.

"The House cannot be blackmailed in any position before its verdict, said the President of the House. It is not the first time that the President has sent letters for the interventions of the Executive power”, the President of the Parliament said, among other things, in her intervention.

Sotiris Ioannou spoke on behalf of ELAM, who among other things said that his movement disagrees and will vote against the proposal. "Nothing is described beyond an aristology. We would accept it under conditions. If we were telling the truth. That there are two sexes, the boy and the girl, and this is distinguished by their organs. if we told them how to protect themselves from dangers.

This is not what will be implemented in schools. It was implemented in other countries and we have examples&hellip? I challenge anyone to tell us what sex education entails and why it should be mandatory. Do you want us to protect children from rapists? Let's do it, let's vote for stricter penalties&hellip? like chemical castration to all rapists».

«Hands off children… the purity and sanctity of childhood needs to be respected,'' said the ELAM member of parliament, among other things. "It doesn't matter if they are gay or straight, only the parent can decide on the sexual education of the children..", he added. there are operating regulations of the Parliament.

He spoke of a violation of the rules of the House. Even the Prosecutor said that the Constitution is being violated and you are ignoring it. There was no preparation of material.. program schedule.. Prosecutor says no, Ministry says no, OELMEK says no…», said among others Chrysanthos Savvidis on behalf of DIKO.

Independent MP Andreas took the floor Themistocleus.

"I don't recognize any of them tampering with the Constitution and determining whether MPs should speak in this room. I'm ashamed.. here is the temple of the Republic.

Only in North Korea and some sub-Saharan beach or some Amazonian tribe can there be a Parliament that some have decided that the MPs will not be entitled to stand on a matter under vote .

Our infamous theme.. Reading the preamble to the law reveals that whoever wrote it was guided by a sick brain. Dear colleagues, we are living a pornographic and homosexual storm. Let's start with the unconstitutionality of the law. Why is this law unconstitutional? For many and various..

First. He went to the human rights committee.. These issues are regulated by the education committee. But because colleagues love catchy topics and they chose instead of going to the competent committee.. they should have gone to the trade committee, there would have been more seriousness.

Second reason. It is clear through the Constitution that what is taught today and who teaches it in public schools, is not the job of the Parliament to determine them.. it is the job of the Executive, he said in quotes.

The news is renewed.< /p>

Source: www.sigmalive.com

- Advertisement -AliExpress WW

More articles

- Advertisement -AliExpress WW

Latest article