30.7 C
Nicosia
Wednesday, April 17, 2024

The arbitration department did not find anything wrong

Must read

 Δεν βρorκε λτι ;αθος το τμorμα διαιτησΙας

In explanation of phases for the 3rd matchday of the first group and the 4th of the second group, the refereeing department of the KOP proceeded. Apparently, he did not find anything wrong with the decisions since VAR “saved” the situation in some cases.

Details:

DOXA – AEZ 6th minute

b>

Referee's initial decision: Continues the match

VAR: Proposes the Referee to review the phase

Referee's decision after reviewing the phase: Penalty

Explanation: A defensive footballer, who is in his own penalty area, carelessly marks an opponent by making contact with the body. The defender does not play the ball, therefore the intervention by VAR is correct, who suggested to the Referee to review the phase.

VIDEO DOXA – AEZ 6th minute

RECTIFICATION – PAPHOS 31th minute

Referee's original decision: Penalty

VAR: Confirmation of Referee's decision

Explanation: Defensive footballer, the who is in his own recovery area, plays the ball with his arm, which is stretched outside his body, unnaturally increasing the volume of his body. Correct decision by the Referee for a penalty.

VIDEO CORRECTION – PAPHOS 31st minute

CORRECTION – PAPHOS 90 +4 minute

Referee's initial decision: Continues the match

VAR: Suggests the Referee to review the phase

Referee's decision after from phase review: Penalty

Explanation: Defensive football player in his own penalty area, marking with his cleats an irregular opponent on his foot. The VAR checked for possible infringement and the position of the ball at the given moment, if it was in the field of play. After the check that was made, the VAR correctly suggested to the Referee a review of the phase.

VIDEO CORRECTION – PAPHOS 90th minute +4

CORRECTION – PAPHOS 90+9 minutes

Referee's initial decision: Continues the match

VAR : Inform the Referee about the position of the goalkeeper – Factual VAR review

Referee's decision after the intervention of VAR: Penalty replay

Explanation: VAR correctly informed the Referee of the position of the goalkeeper when the penalty was taken, as the goalkeeper should have at least part of his foot touching the goal line or behind it. The penalty kick was replayed correctly.

VIDEO CORRECTION – PAPHOS 90th minute +9

ARIS – APOEL 41th minute

Referee's initial decision: Red card for denying an obvious goal-scoring opportunity p>

VAR: Confirmation of the Referee's decision

Explanation: A defensive player commits a tactical foul to prevent a counter-attack. Since he missed an obvious goal scoring opportunity, the Referee rightly punished him with a straight red card.

ARIS – APOEL VIDEO 41st minute

Source: gipedo.politis.com.cy

- Advertisement -AliExpress WW

More articles

- Advertisement -AliExpress WW

Latest article