20.9 C
Nicosia
Tuesday, April 30, 2024
type here...
Sport

APOEL's penalty is correct – Analysis of phases (Cup, 7th & 9th matches)

0
19

Must read

Σωστo το πéναλ τοΟΛ φΑσε λο & 9η νικor)The KOP Refereeing Department analyzes and explains phases from Cyta Championship matches for a better understanding of referee and VAR decisions, the application of the refereeing regulations and the VAR protocol. </p> <p>Some phases are selected from each matchday regarding cases in which, rightly or wrongly, intervention was or was not made by the VAR in relation to the decisions of the referees, based on the VAR protocol.</p> <p> <strong>For the 7th (Group A) and 9th (Group B) matchday of the B' phase as well as the first semi-final matches of the Coca – Cola Cup, the following phases have been selected:</strong></p> <p> < p><strong>PAPHOS – APOLLON </strong><strong>85</strong><strong>th</strong><strong> minute</strong></p> <p><strong>Referee's initial decision: </strong>Continues the match – End</p> <p><strong> VAR</strong>: Confirmation of the Referee's decision</p> <p><strong>Explanation</strong>: Although there were several attacking players in an offside position, none of them obstructed the goalkeeper or took any action that had an impact on the goalkeeper's ability to save the ball. Correct decision by the entire Refereeing team (Referee, Assistant Referee and VAR).</p> <p><strong>VIDEO PAPHOS – APOLLON 85th minute</strong></p> <p><strong>ARIS – OMONIA < /strong><strong>41</strong><strong>th</strong><strong> minute</strong></p> <p><strong>Referee</strong>'s initial decision: Direct free kick and yellow card</p> <p><strong>VAR</strong>: Proposes the Referee to review the phase</p> <p><strong>Referee's decision after reviewing the phase</strong>: Immediate free kick and red card</p> <p><strong>Explanation</strong>: A soccer player clearly kicks an opponent with his foot. The Referee initially punished the footballer with a yellow card, but after proper VAR intervention and a review of the phase, the Referee punished the footballer with a red card for violent conduct.</p> <p><strong>VIDEO ARIS- OMONIA 41st minute< /strong></p> <p><strong>MARS – OMONIA </strong><strong>74</strong><strong>o</strong><strong> minute</strong></p> <p ><strong>Referee's initial decision</strong>: Penalty</p> <p><strong>VAR</strong>: Proposes the Referee to review the phase</p> <p><strong>Referee's decision after reviewing the phase</strong>: Free Referee</p> <p><strong>Explanation: </strong>Normal soccer contact, shoulder to shoulder, between two soccer players. High intensity was not used, the contact is side to side and there was no illegal action by the defender. Correct decision by the VAR to suggest to the Referee a review of the phase.</p> <p><strong>VIDEO ARIS – OMONIA 74th minute</strong></p> <p><strong>KARMIOTISSA – GLORY </strong><strong>52</strong><strong>th</strong><strong> minute</strong ></p> <p><strong>Referee's initial decision</strong>: Penalty</p> <p><strong>VAR</strong>: Proposes Referee to review the phase</p> <p> <strong>Referee's decision after reviewing the phase: </strong>Free Referee</p> <p><strong>Explanation: </strong>Very correct decision by the VAR, to suggest to the Referee a review of the phase, as it was a normal claim for the ball between two football players.</p> <p><strong>VIDEO KARMIOTISSA – GLORY 52nd minute</strong></p> <p><strong>NATIONAL</strong><strong>K</strong><strong>OS </strong><strong>– AEZ </strong><strong>41</strong><strong>o</strong><strong> strong><strong> minute</strong></p> <p><strong>Referee's initial decision</strong>: Penalty</p> <p><strong>VAR</strong>: Proposes Referee to reconsider of the phase</p> <p><strong>Referee's decision after reviewing the phase: </strong>Stays with his original decision – Penalty</p> <p><strong>Explanation: </strong>The Referee detected a foul in the penalty area, in a not so strong contact by the defending footballer. In incidents like this, in which there is no clear and obvious mistake by the Referee, VAR should not have intervened.</p> <p><strong>VIDEO ETHNIKOS – AEZ 41st minute</strong></p> <p> < p><strong>PAFOS – APOEL </strong><strong>55</strong><strong>th</strong><strong> minute</strong></p> <p><strong>Referee's initial decision </strong>: Continues the match</p> <p><strong>VAR</strong>: Suggests the Referee to review the phase</p> <p><strong>Referee's decision after reviewing the phase</strong> >: Penalty</p> <p><strong>Explanation</strong>: A defensive player clearly trips an opponent inside his own penalty area. VAR correctly suggested to the Referee a review of the phase. The Referee's decision to award a penalty after reviewing the phase is also correct.</p> <p><strong>VIDEO PAFOS – APOEL 55th minute</strong></p> <p><noindex></p> <div class=Source: gipedo.politis.com.cy

Previous article
Serial killer Zodiac's message deciphered after 50 years – What it tells the Police
Next article
It just needs… sealing
- Advertisement -AliExpress WW

More articles

- Advertisement -AliExpress WW

Latest article

© 2024 Cyprus Digest. All rights reserved.

Popular in Cyprus

About Us

Popular Category

Editor Picks

MORE STORIES

Commission intervention for the Greece-Cyprus-Israel electrical interconnection